|
|
转自乌有之乡
原转者按：
以下是“乙支军演”的详细分析，后面附有美国全球安全网站（www.globalsecurity.com）关于“5027计划”的内容。
美韩军演，中国人做出各种各样的猜测，谁知道，美国人早就公布出来了。可惜的是没有一个中国人发现……多么令人无语啊……
郁闷啊……中国的一大堆人天天猜测美国的战术，谁知道人家早就公布了……
想想看，假如美国把中国打败了，然后对仍然不服气的中国人说：“我们的作战计划早就公布了，你们为什么不去看看呢？”
啊……这是多么令人绝望的场面……
美国说中国的军事不透明……
美国确实透明啊，作战计划公开贴，就差部队番号、行动时间了……
美国人自信心爆棚，根本不担心别人会采取针对行动。
这才是美国的可怕之处。
他们敢这么做，一定是有后招的。
后招是什么呢？让人不敢想象……
我把这些东西拿给我父亲看，我父亲说道：
一般来说，针对各种情况，都有好几套作战方案，并且随时随地调整补充完善的。
就看谁敢于拼命，中国比美国人敢于拼命，美国人就会退避三舍。
否则，所有的威胁就会付诸实施了。
问题是，有人敢拼命吗？或者说，有多少人敢拼命？
[专题]乙支军演：第二次朝鲜战争的总预演
http://war.news.163.com/10/0816/18/6E7QOG9900014J0G.html
 从8月16日-26日，美国和韩国将在日本海与黄海举行“乙支自由卫士”联合军演。这是两国在近一个月内，第二次进行大规模演习，而且投入的兵力大大增加，韩国民间还动员了超过40万人参与演习。“乙支自由卫士”演习究竟有些什么内容？它又有何目的？网易军事独家为您作出分析。
 2009年“乙支·焦点透镜”演习改名为“乙支·自由卫士”，图为韩军AAV7两栖战车在演习中演练滩头冲锋。而今年的乙支·自由卫士演习也是近一个月以来美韩举行的第二次大规模演习（图中小图为7月末的美韩军演）。
“乙支·自由卫士”演习旨在检验5027作战计划
“乙支·自由卫士”演习原名为“乙支·焦点透镜”，是美韩两国联合举行的战区级计算机模拟、带部分实兵演习。该演习于1976年由“乙支”民防演习和“焦点透镜”指挥所模拟演习两部分合并而成，自1982年起，由指挥所演习发展为指挥所与实兵相结合的演习，1988年加入模拟战争样式。该演习为年度例行性演习，每年8至9月份举行一次，为期约两周，是迄今世界上规模最大的计算机模拟军事演习。2009年，“乙支·焦点透镜”演习改名为“乙支·自由卫士”。
“乙支·自由卫士”演习旨在检验美韩“5027”朝鲜半岛联合防御作战计划，具体目标有3个：一、演练美韩军队联合指挥体系在危机情况下的作战指挥程序、计划及体制，提高美韩两军的战备水平和互通性及联合作战能力；二、重点提高韩国军队在没有美军支援情况下的自主防御能力；三、促进韩国军、民、警系统与政府部门在应对突发事件时的相互协调与配合。
“乙支·自由卫士”演习的参演单位
由于韩国仍未收回战时指挥权，今年的“乙支·自由卫士”演习仍由美国军方主导实施。即美军参谋长联席会议指导，美军太平洋总部协调，美韩联合部队司令部负责具体组织，美韩联合部队司令部司令（驻韩美军司令兼任）任总指挥。美方的主要参演单位有，美太平洋总部、驻韩美军司令部及所属部队司令部、部分国民警卫队及后备役部队等。韩方的主要参演单位则有，韩陆海空三军各级司令部、中央政府与地方各级机关与部门，预备役及民防系统等。
 韩国伞兵演练敌后空降作战。演习的最后阶段不仅是韩军成功进行了防御，更是还发起反攻攻入朝鲜境内。需要注意的是韩国政府及民防机构也参与演习（图中小图即为韩民众举行防生化攻击演习）。
需要说明的是，韩国政府及民防机构也参与其中，主要是负责演习的民防部分。而美军参加该演习的指挥单位和部队数量则不定，每年都会根据演习背景设定来调整。如99年的演习，因为朝鲜试射大浦洞导弹，演习背景设定加入了战区弹道导弹拦截，美军战略司令部和航天司令部因此首次加入演习。
“乙支·自由卫士”演习的内容简介
“乙支·自由卫士”演习通常设想朝鲜在内外交困的情况下，突然向韩国发动全面进攻。韩国政府迅速加强“三八线”附近的兵力部署，并在全国范围内进行总动员，宣布进入一级战备状态。战争爆发后，韩军依据自主防御作战原则，陆、海、空三军各自加强重点防线守卫，同时协同作战，抵御朝军的全方位入侵。韩国中央和地方各级政府与部门迅速实施平战体制转换措施，民防系统与警察联合加强警戒，以防止朝军特种部队渗透，确保后方社会稳定与基础设施完善，维持有效的后勤补给。韩军的防御作战基本阻滞了朝军的进攻步伐，驻太平洋战区美军则不断从韩方控制点登陆朝鲜半岛，驰援韩军。随后，美韩联军部队向入侵朝军发起反攻，并攻入朝鲜境内……
该演习分为民防演习与军事演习两部分，民防演习部分主要演练韩政府部门的平战体制转换程序，并由民防系统与警察联合实施战时警戒、基础设施维护等民防科目的演练。军事演习部分主要演练韩军自主防御、美军快速支援及美韩联合军队的战时应急部署与展开。
可以说“乙支·自由卫士”演习就是“第二次朝鲜战争”的总预演，每年进行一次。
 韩媒设想的美韩军队对朝作战计划图，可见图中美韩将动用B-2轰炸机，巡航导弹，预警机等多种先进装备对朝鲜境内关键设施发动袭击。图中小图为2010年6月28日，美国密歇根号巡航导弹核潜艇突然现身韩国釜山海军基地，这与美韩的作战计划相信不无关系。
“乙支·自由卫士”演习的蓝本为美韩“5027”朝鲜半岛联合防御作战计划（CFC OPLAN 5027）。“5027”作战计划在冷战时期保密程度非常高，以至于目前媒体仍无法明确该计划的存在。直至1994年3月23日，韩国时任国防部长李炳台在国会作证时才正式承认美韩军队之间存在“5027”联合作战计划，但对于具体细节，外界仍然很少获知。
“5027”作战计划大致轮廓
美国全球安全网站（www.globalsecurity.com）通过整理相关新闻报道和其它消息来源，勾勒出了“5027”作战计划的一个大致轮廓[ 详细 ]。“5027”作战计划中的“50”是美军太平洋总部的代号；“2”是作战地区的代号，代表朝鲜半岛；“7”是作战计划的序列号。而根据修改年份的不同，名称后还带有修改年份的数字，如“5027-94”、“5027-98”、“5027-00”、“5027-04”等。
“5027”作战计划原先为一个纯防御性质的作战计划。但在冷战期间，随着美韩方面经济军力优势的扩大，从1983年起“5027”作战计划开始加入反攻至朝鲜境内的内容。到1994年，“5027”作战计划的设想结果已经变成美韩联军占领平壤、实现韩国主导下的朝鲜半岛统一。以“5027-98”为例，美韩联军将分4阶段进行战争：1、在朝鲜可能发动攻击之前，只要有任何具体事证证明朝鲜准备动武，美韩联军将根据事先选定的目标（包括北朝鲜的炮兵阵地和轰炸机机场）进行先发制人打击；2、阻止朝鲜的攻势；3、准备反击；4、全面进攻北朝鲜，包括“仁川登陆”的重演，将北朝鲜的国土一分为二，并夺取平壤，摧毁朝鲜的党政军机器，最后由交给韩国控制。
“5027”实为进攻性作战计划
尽管美韩政府在宣传上，或者“5027”作战计划所用的字眼均为“防御性作战计划”。但从现行计划的内容来看，包含有攻入朝鲜境内、颠覆朝鲜政权的内容，事实上是一个进攻性作战计划，至少不是一个纯防御性计划。这与60年前的朝鲜战争一样，越过三八线向北大规模进攻，就意味着战争性质的改变。这也是朝鲜政府对“乙支·自由卫士”等美韩例行演习历来反应激烈的原因，今年也不例外。
而根据朝鲜中央通信社2006年4月出版的《白宫的黑色箭标》，美军还制定了“5028”作战计划，这是一个核战争计划。为了应对朝鲜在面临大规模侵入时进行核还击的可能性，美军计划在战时出动“F-15E”、“B-1”、“B-2”等战斗机和轰炸机对朝鲜的宁边核设施、导弹基地等。
 今年的“乙支·自由卫士”演习首次加入了进入朝鲜境内解救开城工业园区人质的演习内容，这也从侧面说明了“乙支·自由卫士”这一年度演习的内容在不断根据最新情况进行修改和完善。
今年演习的2项新内容
尽管“乙支·自由卫士”演习以5027作战计划为蓝本，但因应局势的新变化，都会有新的演习内容加入。例如前面提到的99年演习，就因为朝鲜试射大浦洞导弹，加入了战区反导演练，今年则有2个新内容。
根据韩国《朝鲜日报》报道，今年的“乙支·自由卫士”演习将首次加入解救人质的演习，以应对北韩封锁开城工业园区后，韩国人员沦为人质等“可能情况”。美韩军方将进行具体战争情景设定，在A-10对地攻击机、AH-64攻击直升机的掩护下，MH-47和MH-60等特战直升机搭载特种部队突入开城工业区解救人质。
而因为今年的20国集团峰会将在韩国首尔举行，“乙支·自由卫士”演习还加入了城市防毒气演习等民军联合的高强度反恐训练。
从军演看美军作战预案的完善
另外值得一提的是，尽管“乙支·自由卫士”演习以战区计算机模拟演习为主，但实际投入人员的数量并不少，今年的演习因应目前半岛紧张的局势，参演人员更是创下新的记录。韩国方面动员了40万军民；而美军也出动3万人，比往年大幅增加一倍。
这些均反应了美军的灵活性，能够及时根据实际形势调整计划。美国作为世界头号军事强国，拥有世界上最庞大的军事情报体系，这是其预设作战计划可以得到及时更新的主要原因。作战预案的重要性在阿富汗战争初期就有所体现，2001年9·11事件发生后仅36天，美国在10月17日即发动针对塔利班和基地组织的阿富汗战争，11月13日就将首都喀布尔攻陷。这种战争反应速度，没有完善的预案是不可能实现的。而在朝鲜半岛，美军就是通过“乙支·自由卫士”、“关键决心”等例行演习，不断完善5027作战计划。
综上所述，“乙支·自由卫士”作为美韩两国联合举行的战区级计算机模拟、带部分实兵演习，主要目的是为了验证和完善美韩5027朝鲜半岛防御作战计划，实质上是“第二次朝鲜战争”的总预演。因为5027作战计划带有大规模侵入朝鲜的内容，所以朝鲜政府对“乙支·自由卫士”演习一直反应激烈。
进入网易军事作者：黄治茂
// 北京互联网违法不良信息举报 不良信息举报信箱 主编信箱 给网易提意见 新闻地图 历史回顾About NetEase - 公司简介 - 联系方法 - 招聘信息 - 客户服务 - 相关法律 - 网络营销 - 网站地图
网易公司版权所有
©1997-2010 5027作战计划全文（请英文好的同志们帮忙翻译一下，另外发个帖。本人英文不好，基本不认识里面的单词。） http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/oplan-5027.htm OPLAN 5027 Major Theater War - West
OPLAN 5027 is the US-ROK Combined Forces Command basic warplan. Under Operations Plan 5027 (CINCUNC/CFC OPLAN 5027), the United States plans to provide units to reinforce the Republic of Korea in the event of external armed attack. These units and their estimated arrival dates are listed in the Time Phased Force Deployment List (TPFDL), Appendix 6, to Annex A to CINCUNC/CFC OPLAN 5027. The TPFDL is updated biennially through U.S./ROK agreements. CINCUNC/CFC OPLAN 5027 is distributed with a SECRET-U.S./ROK classification.
Pyongyang can credibly threaten the prompt destruction of Seoul with conventional arms alone. The North Korean military could also establish a shallow foothold across the DMZ. However, the DPRK's ability to sustain these offensive operations, or advance its forces further to the south, is questionable. South Korean and American air forces could quickly establish air supremacy and destroy North Korean ground forces. The ensuing buildup of US forces in Korea could reverse any remaining North Korean advances into the South, and unlease offensive operations into the North. North Korea does not require long-range missiles with nuclear, chemical, or biological warheads to devastate Seoul or to make a land grab across the DMZ. Such weapons are needed to deter or defeat an American counteroffensive into North Korea.
Pyongyang has the ability to start a new Korean War, but not to survive one.
North Korea has about 500 long-range artillery tubes within range of Seoul, double the levels of a the mid-1990s. Seoul is within range of the 170mm Koksan gun and two hundred 240mm multiple-rocket launchers. The proximity of these long-range systems to the Demilitarized Zone threatens all of Seoul with devastating attacks. Most of the rest of North Korea's artillery pieces are old and have limited range. North Korea fields an artillery force of over 12,000 self-propelled and towed weapon systems. Without moving any artillery pieces, the North could sustain up to 500,000 rounds an hour against Combined Forces Command defenses for several hours.
North Korea's short-term blitzkrieg strategy envisions a successful surprise attack in the early phase of the war to occupy some or all of South Korea before the arrival of US reinforcements on the Korean Peninsula. North Korean ground forces, totaling some 1 million soldiers, are composed of some 170 divisions and brigades including infantry, artillery, tank, mechanized and special operation forces. Of the total, about 60 divisions and brigades are deployed south of the Pyongyang-Wonsan line. North Korea has deployed more than half of its key forces in forward bases near the border. Seventy percent of their active force, to include 700,000 troops, 8,000 artillery systems, and 2,000 tanks, is garrisoned within 100 miles of the Demilitarized Zone. Much of this force is protected by underground facilities, including over four thousand underground facilities in the forward area alone. From their current locations these forces can attack with minimal preparations. This means a surprise attack on South Korea is possible at any time without a prior redeployment of its units.
The North Korean navy has also deployed 430 surface combatants and about 60 percent of some 90 submarine combat vessels near the front line in forward bases. With about 40 percent of its 790 fighter planes deployed near the front line, the North Korean air force could launch a surprise attack on any part of South Korea within a short period of time.
The Democratic People's Republic of Korea possesses larger forces than Iraq, and they are already deployed along South Korea's border. A war could explode after a warning of only a few hours or days, not weeks. Unlike in the Persian Gulf, this attack would be prosecuted along a narrow peninsula on mountainous terrain. It would probably be accompanied by massed artillery fire, commando raids, and chemical weapons. Initially, the primary battlefield would be only about 125 kilometers wide and 100 kilometers deep. The DPRK attack would be conducted against well-prepared ROK forces in fortified positions and against larger US forces than in the Persian Gulf. Most probably, the DPRK attack would aim at seizing nearby Seoul by advancing down the Kaesong-Munsan, Kumwa, and Chorwon corridors. If successful, North Korean forces might also try to conquer the entire peninsula before large US reinforcements arrive.
The South Barrier Fence is the Southern part of the DMZ. The South Koreans have a series of Defensive lines that cross the entire peninsula, but with the exception of the South Barrier Fence, they aren't connected completely across the peninsula. They are designed to withstand an attack and allow a minimum force to hold a line while reinforcement/counter attack forces are assembled and sent to destroy any penetrations.
The basic goal of a North Korean southern offensive is destruction of allied defenses either before South Korea can fully mobilize its national power or before significant reinforcement from the United States can arrive and be deployed. The primary objective of North Korea's military strategy is to reunify the Korean Peninsula under North Korean control within 30 days of beginning hostilities. A secondary objective is the defense of North Korea.
To accomplish these ambitious objectives, North Korea envisions fighting a two-front war. The first front, consisting of conventional forces, is tasked with breaking through defending forces along the DMZ, destroying defending CFC forces, and advancing rapidly down the entire peninsula. This operation will be coordinated closely with the opening of a second front consisting of SOF units conducting raids and disruptive attacks in CFC's rear.
The DPRK offensive against the ROK will consist of three phases. The objective of the first phase will be to breach the defenses along the DMZ and destroy the forward deployed forces. The objective of the second phase will be to isolate Seoul and consolidate gains. The objective of the third phase will be to pursue and destroy remaining forces and occupy the remainder of the peninsula.
Approximately forty percent of the South Korean population resides within 40 miles of Seoul. While the terrain north of Seoul is dominated by rice paddies offering limited off-road mobility, the terrain west of Seoul is a wide coastal plan with the main invasion routes to Seoul. North Korean forces attacking Seoul through the Chorwon or Munsan corridors would have to cross the Han or Imjin rivers (while these rivers freeze in the winter, the ice is not strong enough to support heavy armor). The narrow eastern coastal plain is lightly settled and less heavily defended, though mountains make movement of forces from the east coast difficult.
The US plans are based on the belief that the North Koreans would not be successful in consolidating their gains around Seoul and could be pushed back across the DMZ -- though the plans assume the North may break through the DMZ in places. A critical issue is strategic warning of unambiguous signs that North Korea is preparing an attack. The warning time has reportedly been shortened from about ten days to about three days as North Korea has covered its military activities.
The US-ROK defense plan would be shaped not only by the threat but also by the mountainous terrain. Korea is commonly regarded as rugged infantry terrain that invites neither mobile ground warfare nor heavy air bombardment, but North Korea has assembled large armored forces that are critical to exploiting breakthroughs, and these forces would pass down narrow corridors that are potential killing zones for U.S. airpower. A new Korean War would bear little resemblance to the conflict of 1950­53.
During Phase 1, US-ROK forces would conduct a vigorous forward defense aimed at protecting Seoul. Their campaign would be dominated by combined-arms ground battles waged with infantry, artillery, and armor. US air and naval forces would conduct close air support, interdiction, and deep strike missions. After Phase 1, US-ROK operations in Phase 2 would probably focus on seizing key terrain, inflicting additional casualties on enemy forces, and rebuffing further attacks. Phase 3, to start when the US ground buildup was complete and ROK forces were replenished, would be a powerful counteroffensive aimed at destroying the DPRK's military power. The war plan envisions amphibious assaults into North Korea by US Army and Marines at the narrow waist of North Korea. The entire resources of the US Marine Corps would flow there to establish a beachead, with substantial Army resources quickly conducting over-the-shore operations.
OPLAN 5027-74
The the forward defense strategy in OPLAN 5027 was developed by Combined Forces Commander US General James F. Hollingsworth in 1973 [this discussion is based on "Winning in Korea Without Landmines," by Caleb Rossiter]. Prior to this time, OPLAN 5027 focused primarily on defeating a North Korean invasion. It envisioned the allies staging a 50-mile fighting retreat along the primary armored invasion route from the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ), and taking up strong positions [the "Hollingsworth Line"] south of the broad Han River where it bisects the South Korean capital of Seoul. There, allied forces would wait for US reinforcements before counter-attacking.
Concerned that the US withdrawal from Vietnam might lead the DPRK to question American commitment to defend South Korea, Hollingsworth altered the focus of OPLAN 50-27 to a forward-based offensive strategy. The goal was to convince North Korea that an invasion could bring an end to its regime. The new posture moved most allied artillery, tanks,and infantry forward toward the Military Control Zone (MCZ), which runs five miles south of the DMZ. General Hollingsworth announced plans to strike north after these forces defeated the invasion. He assigned two brigades of the US 2nd Division to seize the North Korean staging city of Kaesong just across the DMZ, and promised around-the-clock raids on the North by B-52 bombers and a “violent,short war ” to capture the capital of Pyongyang.
It was unclear whether Hollingsworth's plans included the use of the US tactical nuclear weapons then on the Korean peninsula if the North Korean invasion forces overwhelmed the allies. At the time, the Congressional Budget Office predicted that without nuclear weapons,the new strategy could result in the initial loss of Seoul. In 1975 Gen. Hollingsworth stated that the US had a '9-day war plan', according to which North Korea would be defeated in a few days in a violent clash with 700-800 air sorties.
OPLAN 5027-94
As of 1994 it was reported that a variant OPLAN 5027 under consideration by CINCPAC focused on a scenario under which ROK forces were able to blunt a DPRK offensive and stabilize a defensive line at FEBA Bravo (20-30 miles below the DMZ). Subsequently, US-ROK Combined Forces Command would execute a retaliatory offensive once US reinforcements arrived. A major air campaign against northern forces would be required before the counteroffensive could begin. A US Marine Expeditionary Force (in division strength) and the 82nd Air Assault Division, along with ROK divisions, would launch an overland offensive north toward Wonsan from the east coas. Soon thereafter, a combined US-ROK force would stage an amphibious landing near Wonsan, and advance to Pyongyang. Subsequently, a combined US-ROK force would execute a major counteroffensive from north of Seoul aimed at seizing Pyongyang. This would be achieved either by linking up with the force at Wonsan, or meeting it at Pyongyang.
A favorable outcome for the South depends on two conditions. First, the ROK forces must withstand DPRK forces during the initial 5-15 days of North Koean offensive actions. Second, they must hold the line while US and ROK forces are mobilized for the counteroffensive, which could take another 15-20 days.
The ROK and US war plan included a counteroffensive that would destroy the North Korean regime. South Korean state television reported on 24 March 1994 that Seoul and Washington planned to topple the North Korean government if the Stalinist state attacks the South. The Korean Broadcasting System said that rather than simply driving back the North’s troops, the plan provides for a counteroffensive to seize Pyongyang and try to topple the government of Kim Il Sung [“KBS reports plan to topple Kim Il Sung,” Washington Times , March 25, 1994, p. 16]. In 1994, the South Korean president, Kim Young-sam, said: “Once a major military confrontation occurs, North Korea will definitely be annihilated” [Ranan R. Lurie, “In a Confrontation, ‘North Korea Will Definitely Be Annihilated,’” Los Angeles Times (Washington Edition), March 24, 1994, p. 11].
The battlefield coordination line (BCL) first appeared in MEF operations during Ulchi Focus Lens (UFL) 94. It was employed as a workaround "MEF internal fire support coordination line (FSCL)" since the combatant commander approved theater FSCL was too distant from the Marine close fight to be of any value. The extended placement of the combatant commander's FSCL was due mostly to cultural and programmatic conflicts between the Army and the Air Force (read JFACC or in Korea, the CFACC). The point of contention has always centered on the area between the FSCL and the ground commander's forward boundary. The Air Force has historically demanded that the Army "coordinate" strikes forward of the FSCL with the CFACC prior to execution. The Army doesn't like the idea of having to coordinate (thus delay operations) with another component inside its own assigned area of operation, so to avoid the problem, they push the FSCL out to a point beyond their area of influence, ATACMS soliloquies notwithstanding. In effect, the FSCL became a de facto forward boundary.
OPLAN 5027-96
After the nuclear crisis of 1994, OPLAN 5027 was completely overhauled, including a new agreement to ensure Japanese bases are available if the US goes to war with North Korea. The updated Japan-US defense cooperation guidelines, which the Japanese parliament approved 24 May 1999, allow the US to prepare for a Korean war by stationing its military forces in Japan and the Pacific region.
OPLAN 5027-98
Further revisions to the concept of operations were elaborated in OPLAN 5027-98, which was adopted in late 1998. Previous versions of OPLAN 5027 had called for stopping a North Korean invasion and pushing them back across the Demilitarized Zone. The new version of the plan was more clearly focused on offensive operations into North Korea. A senior US official was reported to have said: "When we're done, they will not be able to mount any military activity of any kind. We will kill them all." The goal of the revised plan was to "abolish North Korea as a functioning state, end the rule of its leader, Kim Jong Il, and reorganize the country under South Korean control."
New priorities also focused on countering sudden chemical and biological attacks against Seoul. The South Korean military reportedly estimates that 50 missiles carrying nerve gas could kill up to 38 percent of Seoul's 12 million inhabitants.
The new plan called for a campaign against North Korean armed forces and government involving "defeating them in detail." The operation would be conducted in four phases: activities prior to a North Korean attack, halting the initial North Korean assault, regrouping for a counter-attack, and finally a full scale invasion of North Korea to seize Pyongyang.
According to reports, the new military plan included preemptive attacks against North Korea's military bases, including long-range artillery and air forces bases, if intellitence detected a hard evidence that North Korea was preparing to wage war. US and South Korean military leaders included pre-emptive strikes in this revised war plan. If the North Koreans showed unmistakable signs of preparing to strike, and the US decided not to wait until South Korea had been attacked, US forces had targets in North Korea already picked out and weapons assigned to destroy them.
Tasks performed during the Destruction Phase of the OPLAN reportedly involve a strategy of maneuver warfare north of the Demilitarized Zone with a goal of terminating the North Korea regime, rather than simply terminating the war by returning North Korean forces to the Truce Line. In this phase operations would include the US invasion of North Korea, the destruction of the Korean People’s Army and the North Korean government in Pyongyang. The plan includes the possibility of a Marine amphibious assault into the narrow waist of North Korea to cut the country in two. US troops would occupy north Korea and "Washington and Seoul will then abolish north Korea as a state and ‘reorganize’ it under South Korean control.
When this new war plan leaked to the press in November 1998, it escalated tensions between the United States and North Korea. North Korea sharply criticized OPLAN 5027-98, charging that it was a war scenario for the invasion of North Korea. Pyongyang blamed Seoul for the revision of OPLAN 5027, and a North Korean Army spokesman stated 02 December 1998 that North Korea had the right to take a containment offensive while holding mass rallies of military units and various social organizations to criticize OPLAN 5027. Such incidents illustrated North Korea's sensitive reaction to the OPLAN 5027.
On 02 December 1998 the General Staff of the North Korean People's Army (KPA) issued a lengthy and authoritative statement warning that the United States was instigating a new war. The statement stressed that the KPA would rise to the challenge. "We neither want nor avoid a war. If a war is imposed, we will never miss the opportunity," the statement read. The unique aspect of Pyongyang's public statements is the preoccupation with "US war-plan # 5027" as an imminent threat. Official Pyongyang is adamant that "war-plan # 5027" is already being implemented, and public statements frequently focus on OPLAN 5027.
OPLAN 5027-00
According to the 04 December 2000 South Korean Defense Ministry White Paper, the United States would deploy up to 690,000 troops on the Korean peninsula if a new war breaks out. The United States apparently had considerably increased the number of troops that would be deployed in any new Korean conflict. The figure had risen from 480,000 in plans made in the early 1990s and 630,000 in the mid-1990s. The latest Time Phased Forces Deployment Data for any contingency on the Korean Peninsula is comprised of 690,000 troops, 160 Navy ships and 1,600 aircraft deployed from the U.S. within 90 days.
The South Korean defense ministry described the increase as the result of a new US "win-win strategy," which would require the United States to have the capability to fight two wars simultaneously, such as in the Middle East and East Asia. Along with equipment to counter weapons of mass destruction, the US plan focused on the deployment of aircraft carriers and advanced aircraft to attack enemy artillery units in the early stages of any war.
US augmentation forces, including the army, navy, air force, and the marine corps, are composed of approximately 690,000 troops. The augmented forces comprise army divisions, carrier battle groups with highly advanced fighters, tactical fighter wings, and marine expeditionary forces in Okinawa and on the US mainland. The US augmentation forces have contingency plans for the Korean peninsula to execute the Win-Win Strategy in support of United Nations Command (UNC)/Combined Forces Command (CFC) operation plans.
There are three types of augmentation capability: Flexible Deterrence Options (FDOs), Force Module Packages (FMPs), and the Time-Phased Forces Deployment Data (TPFDD). These are executed through a unit integration process, when the commander of CFC requests them and the US Joint Chiefs of Staff orders them in case of a crisis on the Korean peninsula.
FDOs are ready to be implemented when war is imminent. They can be classified into political, economic, diplomatic, and military options. Approximately 150 deterrence options are ready to be employed.
FMPs are measures that augment combat or combat support units that need the most support in the early phase of the war should war deterrence efforts through FDOs fail. Included in the FMPs are elements such as strong carrier battle groups.
Under TPFDD, in which FDO and FMP are included, the key forces are planned ahead of time to be deployed in case of an outbreak of war. There are three types of forces under TPFDD: in-place forces, or forces currently deployed to the peninsula; pre-planned forces, or forces of time-phased deployment in a contingency; and on-call forces, which could be deployed if needed.
CFC Pub 3-1 (Deep Operations ­ Korea) of 1 May 99 requires pre-planned fire support coordination lines (FSCLs) 26 hours prior to ITO execution, and immediate FSCL changes (inside the ITO cycle) 6 hours from transmittal to implementation with nominal FSCL placement 12 to 20 kilometers from the FLOT. The publication discusses the need to avoid confusion and fratricide via frequent FSCL changes, yet still retain the ability to accommodate rapid maneuver. Ground and amphibious force commanders will recommend placement of the FSCL, but the combatant commander is the approving authority.
OPLAN 5027-02
In February 2002 it was reported that the US military was updating OPLAN 5027 in the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks. This includes a military calculation of the force needed to remove North Korean leader Kim Jung Il.
In mid-2002 a top aide to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld briefed a concept of operations for striking North Korea's weapons of mass destruction. This case study in the application of the Bush administration's new doctrine of pre-emptive military action envisioned a swift attack, carried out without consulting South Korea, America's ally on the peninsula. Soon after word of the briefing spread, administration officials, including Secretary of State Colin Powell and Adm. Thomas Fargo, commander of US forces in the Pacific, worked to stifle further discussion of the scheme.
OPLAN 5027-04
In late 2003 it was reported ["Military Alters Plans For Possible Conflicts" By Bradley Graham Washington Post November 18, 2003, pg. 18] that " ... the new plans would allow the United States to respond without waiting for as many ground forces to arrive, by substituting air power for artillery and getting such critical equipment as counter-battery radars -- for pinpointing enemy mortar and artillery fire -- on scene ahead of the rest of their divisions. The resulting force might not be as "elegant" as planners would like, but "it will certainly be capable... "
While Patriot is the only missile defense system deployed by the US military, the Defense Department expected that three "emergency capabilities" for missile defense would begin to emerge in the year 2004. Those capabilities are ground-based midcourse interceptors being installed in Alaska as part of a Pacific test bed; sea-based midcourse interceptors on one or two Navy Aegis ships; and an Airborne Laser prototype. These could provide an emergency capability against a North Korean missile attack, but it was extremely limited. Five anti-missile interceptors will be deployed at the site.
During fiscal year 2003, MDA achieved a 50-percent success rate on hit-to-kill intercepts—one success out of two attempts for each of the GMD and Aegis BMD elements. The actual defensive system to be fielded by 30 September 2004 will have fewer components than planned. MDA could not meet its upper-end goal of fielding 10 GMD interceptors by September 2004. Rather, MDA expected to field 5 interceptors by September 2004 and complete the goal of 10 interceptors by February 2005. In addition, the agency was be hard-pressed to achieve its goal of producing and delivering an inventory of 20 GMD interceptors by December 2005, because GMD contractors had yet to meet the planned production rate by mid-April 2004. The first BMDS block will cost more and deliver fewer fielded components than originally planned. As reported in DOD budget submissions for fiscal years 2004 and 2005, the Aegis BMD interceptor inventory decreased from 20 to 9, the number of Aegis BMD ships upgraded for the long-range surveillance and tracking mission decreased from 15 to 10. An intercept capability by Aegis BMD was not part of the September 2004 Initial Defensive Operations (IDO). By April 2005, two upgraded cruisers with an inventory of five interceptors were expected to be available for engaging short- and medium-range ballistic missiles. The potential operational use of Airborne Laser [ABL] and the sea-based radar as sensors was no longer part of Block 2004. The SBX was fielded as a test asset at the end of Block 2004 (December 2005), and it would be placed on alert as an operational asset during Block 2006.
Following Operation Iraqi Freedom, USFK held a conference for senior military leaders at Osan Air Force Base to evaluate the air component of OPLAN 5027. The conference was held on May 22-23, 2003 and was to adapt lessons learned from the use of UAVs and ground tactics and to "apply them in plans and strategies for 2003" according to 7th Air Foce commander Lt. General Lance Smith. The Air Boss conference discussed specific targets and the impact of new technologies. According to General Smith, as quoted by Stars and Stripes on May 24, 2003 the battle plan has changed considerably.
OPLAN 5027-06
Missile Defense Agency Block 2004, represents calendar years 2004-2005. The ground-based Midcourse Defense will consist of 18 total Ground-based Interceptors, with 2 at Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA. and 16 at Ft. Greely, Alaska. The Navy's Aegis will consist of 10 sea-based Surveillance and Track Destroyers, 2 Engagement/Surveillance and Track Cruisers, all equiped with 8 Standard Missile-3 sea-based interceptors. A total of 281 Patriot Advanced Capablility-3 missiles will be operated by the US Army. The Sea-based X-band radar will be introduced to the Missile Defense Test Bed in 2005 to provide more realistic sensor information in tests using long-range targets and countermeasures, and will also enhance operational capability.
OPLAN 5027-08
In June 2003 US and Republic of Korea officials agreed to a plan to realign American forces stationed in "The Land of the Morning Calm." In June 4-5 meetings held in the South Korean capital city of Seoul, according to a joint US-South Korean statement, it was decided the operation would consist of two phases. During Phase 1 US forces at installations north of the Han River would consolidate in the Camp Casey (Tongduchon) and Camp Red Cloud (Uijongbu) areas. Both bases are north of Seoul and the Han, but well south of the demilitarized zone that separates North and South Korea. The 14,000-strong US Army 2nd Infantry Division, which provides troops to bases near the DMZ, is headquartered at Camp Red Cloud. During Phase 2 US forces north of the Han River would move to key hubs south of the Han River. US and Korean officials agreed to continue rotational US military training north of the Han even after Phase 2 is completed. The realignment operation would take several years to complete.
Most American troops will be moved out of Seoul by the end of 2007, and all of the US 2nd Infantry Division that's currently patrolling the region north of Seoul will be moved south of Seoul by 2008. Existing military facilities at Osan Air Base and Camp Humphreys, both located south of Seoul, are being expanded and upgraded to accept the redeployed forces.
Missile Defense Agency Block 2006 represents the period of development for calendar years 2006 and 2007. Block 2006 will be the first block in which the Ballistic Missile Defense System will have the ability to intercept an incoming enemy missile in every phase of flight. Up to 10 additional Ground-based Interceptors will be deployed at Ft. Greely, Alaska (for a total of 28 Ground-based Interceptors between Ft. Greely and Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA). The Army will have 231 additional PAC-3 missiles (for a total of 512). The Navy will convert the 10 Aegis Surveillance and Track Destroyers to full Engagement/Surveillance and Track, add up to five additional Aegis Surveillance and Track Destroyers, and add an additional Aegis Engagement/Surveillance and Track Cruiser. By that time the fleet will have up to 20 additional Standard Missile-3 interceptors.
_ntes_nacc = "news"; //站点ID。 neteaseTracker(); |
|
发表于 2010-11-25 13:52:10
发表于 2010-11-25 15:30:22